Nova ferramenta de entrevista investigativa na coleta de testemunhos: a versão brasileira da Self-Administered Interview©
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31060/rbsp.2017.v11.n1.783Palavras-chave:
Entrevista investigativa. Testemunha. Polícia. psicologia do testemunho. Self-Administered Interview©.Resumo
Testemunhas desempenham papel fundamental no âmbito policial e jurídico. No entanto, diversos estudos demonstram que devido à falibilidade da memória humana, o testemunho pode não ser confiável. A melhor maneira de obter relatos fidedignos é colhendo informações tão logo decorrido o crime/acidente. Há poucos anos foi desenvolvida, no Reino Unido, a Self-Administered Interview (SAI©), um protocolo por escrito de entrevista investigativa auto-aplicável para ser aplicada assim que a polícia chega no local. Este material tem revelado resultados positivos no sentido de gerar relatos em maior quantidade e acurácia, além de proteger contra sugestionamentos. O presente estudo buscou realizar a tradução, adaptação e teste da versão brasileira da SAI©. Os resultados indicaram que a versão brasileira obteve resultados praticamente equivalente à original, sugerindo ser uma ferramenta viável de ser utilizada no contexto brasileiro.
Downloads
Referências
ARIEL, Barak; FARRAR, William; SUTHERLAND, Alex. The effect of police bodyworn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, v. 31, n.3, p. 509-535, 2014.
BOON, Roel. Enhancing witness statements: examining the effects of reading a Self Administered Interview on interviewer behaviour and reliabity of witness statements. Dissertação (Mestrado) – Politieacademie. Apeldoorn, Holanda, 2012.
BOWER, Gordon. A multicomponent theory of the memory trace. In: SPENCE, K.; SPENCE, J. (Eds.). The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Academic Press, 1967. v. 1. p. 229-325.
BRASIL. Ministério da Justiça. Avanços científicos em psicologia do testemunho aplicados ao reconhecimento pessoal e aos depoimentos forenses. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Justiça, 2015. (Série Pensando o Direito, v. 59).
CHAN, Jason; MCDERMOTT, Kathleen B.; ROEDIGER III, Henry L. Retrievalinduced facilitation: initially non-tested material can benefit from prior testing of related material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, v. 135, n. 4, p. 553-571, 2006.
CHAN, Jason; THOMAS, Ayanna; BULEVICH, John. Recalling a Witnessed Event Increases Eyewitness Suggestibility – The Reversed Testing Effect. Psychological Science, v. 20, n. 1, p. 66-73, 2009.
DANDO, Coral. Drawing to remember: External support of older adults’ eyewitness performance. PloS One, v. 8, n. 7, p. 1-7, 2013.
DANDO, Coral et al. A modified cognitive interview procedure for frontline police investigators. Applied Cognitive Psychology, v. 23, n. 5, p. 698-716, 2009.
DEFFENBACHER, Kenneth et al. A meta analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, v. 28, n. 6, p. 687-699, 2004.
EBBINGHAUS, Hermann. Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1913.
FISHER, Ronald; BRENNAN, Kendra; MCCAULEY, Michelle. The cognitive interview method to enhance eye witness recall. In: EISEN, M. L.; QUAS, J. A.; GOODMAN, J. S. (Ed.). Memory and suggestibility in the forensic interview. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2002. p. 265-286.
FISHER, Ronald; GEISELMAN, Edward. Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1992.
GABBERT, Fiona et al. The role of initial witness accounts within the investigative process. In: OBXBURGH, G.; MYKLEBUST, T.; GRANT, T.; MILNE, R. (Ed.). Communication in Investigative and Legal Contexts: Integrated Approaches from Forensic Psychology, Linguistics and Law Enforcement, 2015. p. 107-131.
GABBERT, Fiona et al. Protecting against misleading post‐event information with a self‐administered interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, v. 26, n. 4, p. 568-575, 2012.
GABBERT, Fiona; HOPE, Lorraine; FISHER, Ronald. Protecting eyewitness evidence: Examining the efficacy of a self administered interview tool. Law and Human Behavior, v. 33, n. 4, p. 298-309, 2009.
GABBERT, Fiona; MEMON, Amina; ALLAN, Kevin. Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event?. Applied Cognitive Psychology, v. 17, n. 5, p. 533-543, 2003.
GUILLEMIN, Francis; BOMBARDIER, Claire; BEATON, Dorcas. Cross cultural adaptation of health related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of clinical epidemiology, v. 46, n. 12, p. 1417-1432, 2005.
HAMBLETON, Ronald K. Issues, designs, and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In: HAMBLETON, R. K.; MERENDA, P. F.; SPIELBERGER, C. D. Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross cultural assessment. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005. v. 1. p. 3-38.
HJELMSÄTER, Emma; STRÖMWALL, Leif; GRANHAG, Pär. The Self Administered Interview: a means of improving children’s eyewitness performance?. Psychology, Crime & Law, v. 18, n. 10, p. 897-911, 2012.
HOPE, Lorraine; GABBERT, Fiona. Protecting eyewitness evidence: what can the Self Administered Interview (SAI©) contribute to the investigation of road traffic incidents. Impact, v. 19, m. 3, p. 15-18, 2011.
HOPE, Lorraine; GABBERT, Fiona; FISHER, Ronald. From laboratory to the street: capturing witness memory using the self‐administered interview. Legal and criminological psychology, v. 16, n. 2, p. 211-226, 2011.
IBGE. Mudanças Demográficas no Brasil. Subsídios para as Projeções da População. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2015.
JACK, Fiona; MARTYN, Elise; ZAJAC, Rachel. Getting the Picture: Effects of Sketch Plans and Photographs on Children’s, Adolescents’ and Adults’ Eyewitness Recall. Applied Cognitive Psychology, v. 29, n. 5, p. 723-734, 2015.
KARPICKE, Jeffrey; BLUNT, Janell. Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, v. 331, n. 6018, p. 772-775, 2011.
KEBBELL, Mark; MILNE, Rebecca; WAGSTAFF, Graham. The cognitive interview: A survey of its forensic effectiveness. Psychology, Crime and Law, v. 5, n. 1-2, p. 101-115, 1999.
KORIAT, Asher et al. What do we know about what we cannot remember? Accessing the semantic attributes of words that cannot be recalled. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, v. 29, n. 6, p.1095-1109, 2003.
KRIX, Alana C. et al. Eyewitness Evidence Obtained with the Self‐Administered Interview Is Unaffected by Stress. Applied Cognitive Psychology, p. 1-10, 2015.
LAMB, Michael E. et al. Accuracy of investigators’ verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims. Law and Human Behavior, v. 24, n. 6, p. 699-707, 2000.
LIN, Kuei. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, p. 255-268, 1989.
LOFTUS, Elizabeth. Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30 year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory, v. 12, n. 4, p. 361-366, 2005.
LOFTUS, Elizabeth; MILLER, David; BURNS, Helen. Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory. Journal of experimental psychology: Human learning and memory, v. 4, n. 1, p. 19-35, 1978.
LOPES JR., Aury; DI GESU, Cristina Carla. Prova penal e falsas memórias: em busca da redução de danos. Boletim IBCCrim, n. 175, p. 1-5, 2007.
MARAS, Katie et al. Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Self‐Administered Interview for Witnesses with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Applied Cognitive Psychology, v. 28, n. 5, p. 693-701, 2014.
MCCAULEY, Michelle; FISHER, Ronald. Facilitating children’s eyewitness recall with the revised cognitive interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 80, n. 4, p. 510-519, 1995.
MEMON, Amina; MEISSNER, Christian; FRASER, Joanne. The Cognitive Interview: A meta analytic review and study space analysis of the past 25 years. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, v. 16, n. 4, p. 340-358, 2010.
NÚCLEO, DE ESTUDOS DA VIOLÊNCIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO. 5º Relatório Nacional sobre os Direitos Humanos no Brasil (2001–2010). São Paulo: NEV, 2012.
ORBACH, Yael et al. Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. Child abuse & neglect, v. 24, n. 6, p. 733-752, 2000.
PATERSON, Helen; EIJKEMANS, Hester; KEMP, Richard. Investigating the Impact of Delayed Administration on the Efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, v. 22, n. 2, p. 307-317, 2015.
PATERSON, Helen; KEMP, Richard; FORGAS, Joseph. Co witnesses, confederates, and conformity: Effects of discussion and delay on eyewitness memory. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, v. 16, sup. 1, p. 112-124, 2009.
PICKEL, Kerri. When a lie becomes the truth: The effects of self‐generated misinformation on eyewitness memory. Memory, v. 12, n. 1, p. 14-26, 2004.
PINTO, Luciano; STEIN, Lilian. As bases teóricas da técnica da recriação do contexto na entrevista cognitiva. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, v. 33, n. 2, p. 285-301, 2015.
PRESCOTT, Katherine; MILNE, Rebecca; CLARKE, Jason. How Effective is the Enhanced Cognitive Interview when Aiding Recall Retrieval of Older Adults including Memory for Conversation?. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, v. 8, n. 3, p. 257-270, 2011.
ROEDIGER, Henry; BUTLER, Andrew. The critical role of retrieval practice in long term retention. Trends in cognitive sciences, v. 15, n. 1, p. 20-27, 2011.
ROEDIGER, Henry; KARPICKE, Jeffrey D. Testenhanced learning taking memory tests improves long term retention. Psychological science, v. 17, n. 3, p. 249-255, 2006.
SKAGERBERG, Elin; WRIGHT, Daniel. The prevalence of co witnesses and co witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law, v. 14, n. 6, p. 513-521, 2008.
SMITH, Steven. Theoretical principles of context dependent memory. Theoretical aspects of memory, v. 2, p. 168-195, 1994.
STEIN, Lilian; ÁVILA, Gustavo; BENIA, Luis. Witness interviewing in Brazil. In: WALSH, David; OXBURGH, G. E.; REDLICH, A. D. (Orgs.). International developments and practices in investigative interviewing and interrogation. London: Routledge, 2015.
STEIN, Lilian; MEMON, Amina. Testing the efficacy of the cognitive interview in a developing country. Applied Cognitive Psychology, v. 20, n. 5, p.597-605, 2006.
TULVING, Endel; THOMSON, Donald. Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological review, v. 80, n. 5, p. 352-371, 1973.
WESTERA, Nina; POWELL, Martine. Prosecutors’ perceptions of the utility of video evidence for adult complainants of sexual assault. Criminal law journal, v. 39, p. 198-207, 2015.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Licenciamento
A Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública usa a Licença Creative Commons como forma de licenciamento para suas obras publicadas. A licença utilizada segue o modelo CC BY 4.0 - Attribution 4.0 International.
Para consultar os dirietos permitidos direcione-se para a licença completa ou para a nossa página de Direitos dos autores e Licenças.
