Melhorando a qualidade do contato entre policiais e cidadãos
os treinamentos em “procedural justice”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31060/rbsp.2022.v16.n2.1313Palabras clave:
Policiamento, Treinamento policial, Legitimidade policial, Justiça procedimentalResumen
Este artigo apresenta um levantamento sobre treinamentos em justiça procedimental (procedural justice) realizados por agências policiais. Esses treinamentos, fundamentados nos estudos pioneiros de Tom R. Tyler acerca da legitimidade, têm como objetivos aperfeiçoar os procedimentos dos policiais nos atendimentos à população, melhorar a qualidade da relação entre policiais e cidadãos e, consequentemente, aumentar a legitimidade das autoridades policiais. Por meio de documentos primários e secundários, identificamos os treinamentos já implementados e selecionamos quatro deles para analisarmos mais detalhadamente. A análise mostrou como diferentes polícias, que apresentam diferentes históricos e atuam em contextos sociais bastante distintos, apropriam-se dos conceitos de justiça procedimental no intuito de intervir tanto em problemas estruturais quanto em questões mais pontuais do policiamento.
Descargas
Citas
BOTTOMS, A.; TANKEBE, J. Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, v. 102, p. 119-170, 2012.
BRADFORD, B.; QUINTON, P. Self-legitimacy, Police Culture and Support for Democratic Policing in an English Constabulary. British Journal of Criminology, v. 54, n. 6, p. 1023-1046, 2014.
CUBAS, Viviane de O.; TEIXEIRA, Frederico Castelo Branco & OLIVEIRA, André. “Tão diferentes e tão iguais. As percepções de policiais civis e militares de São Paulo sobre suas instituições”. Dilemas - Revista de Estudos de Conflito e Controle Social, v. 13, n.3, p. 801-825, 2020.
FAIR & IMPARTIAL POLICING. FIP Training Courses.
FLEMING, J.; LAFFERTY, G. New management techniques and restructuring for accountability in Australian police organizations. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, v. 23, n. 2, p. 154-168, 2000.
LA VIGNE, N.; JANNETTA, J.; FONTAINE, J.; LAWRENCE, D.; ESTHAPPAN, S. The National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice: Key Process and Outcome Evaluation Findings. Urban Institute, Key Findings from the National Initiative, 2019.
LOWREY-KINBERG, B. Experimental results on the effect of politeness strategies on perceptions of police. Language and Communication, v. 69, p. 42-53, 2019.
MACCOUN, R. Voice, Control, and Belonging: The Double-Edged Sword of Procedural Fairness. Annual Review Law and Social Science, v. 1, p. 171-201, 2005.
MAZEROLLE, L.; ANTROBUS, E.; BENNETT, S.; TYLER, T. R. Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice. Criminology, v. 51, n. 1, p. 33-63, 2013.
MURPHY, K.; TYLER, T. R. Experimenting with procedural justice policing. Journal of Experimental Criminology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 287-292, 2017.
NAGIN, D.; TELEP, C. Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, v. 13, p. 5-28, 2017.
NATIONAL INTIATIVE FOR BUILDING COMMUNITY TRUST AND JUSTICE. Pilot Sites.
NEV/USP. Building Democracy Daily: Human Rights, Violence and Institutional Trust. Report CEPID-FAPESP, 2018.
NIX, J. Police Perceptions of their External Legitimacy in High and Low Crime Areas of the Community. Crime and Delinquency, v. 63, n. 10, p. 1250-1278, 2017.
OWENS, E.; WEISBURG, D.; ALPERT, G.; AMENDOLA, K. Promoting Police Integrity Through Early Engagements and Procedural Justice in the Seattle Police Department. Final Report. National Institute of Justice, 2016.
PINC, T. Treinamento policial: um meio de difusão de políticas públicas que incidem na conduta individual do policial de rua. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência Política) – Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2011.
POVERTY ACTION LAB. Building Effective, Resilient, and Trusted Police Organizations in Mexico City.
PRESIDENT’S TASK FORCE ON 21ST CENTURY POLICING. Final Report of the President’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing. Washington/DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, 2015.
ROSENBAUM, D.; LAWRENCE, D. Teaching Respectful Police-Citizen Encounters and Good Decision Making: Results of a Randomized Control Trial with Police Recruits. National Police Research Platform, 2012.
ROSENBAUM, D.; LAWRENCE, D. Teaching procedural justice and communication skills during police-community encounters: Results of a randomized control trial with police recruits. Journal of Experimental Criminology, v. 13, n. 3, p. 293-319, 2017.
SARGEANT, E.; ANTROBUS, E.; PLATZ, D. Promoting a culture of fairness: police training, procedural justice, and compliance. Journal of Experimental Criminology, v. 13, p. 347-365, 2017.
SARGEANT, E.; MURPHY, K.; MADON, N. Is dissatisfaction with police inevitable? Testing an integrated model of motivational postures and procedural justice in police-citizen contacts. Police Practice and Research, v. 19, n. 2, p.125-137, 2018.
SCOTTISH JUSTICE MATTERS. Policing: Reflections on developments and changes to policing in Scotland.
SKOGAN, W. G. Police and Community in Chicago: A Tale of Three Cities. Oxford/Reino Unido: Oxford University Press, 2006a.
SKOGAN, W. G. Asymmetry in the impact of encounters with police. Policing and Society, v. 16, n. 2, p. 99-124, 2006b.
SKOGAN, W. G.; VAN CRAEN, M.; HENNESY, C. L. Training police for procedural justice. Journal of Experimental Criminology, v. 11, p. 319-334, 2015.
SOUTHORN, D.; LAZARE, S. Officers Accused of Abuses Are Leading Chicago Police’s Implicit Bias Training Program. The Intercept, 2019.
TANKEBE, J. Rightful Authority: exploring the structure of police self-legitimacy. 2014.
TANKEBE, J. In their own eyes: an empirical examination of police self-legitimacy. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, v. 43, n. 2, p. 99-116, 2019.
TANKEBE, J.; MESKO, G. Police self-legitimacy, use of force and pro-organizational behavior in Slovenia. In: Trust and Legitimacy in Criminal Justice: European Perspectives. Nova Iorque/EUA: Springer, 2015.
TYLER, T. R. What Is Procedural Justice? Criteria Used by Citizens to Assess the Fairness of Legal Procedures. Law and Society Review, v. 22, n. 1, p. 103-135, 1988.
TYLER, T. R. Enhancing Police Legitimacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 593, n. 1, p. 84-99, 2004.
TYLER, T. R. Procedural justice and policing: A rush to judgment?. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, v. 13, n. 1, p. 29-53, 2017.
TYLER, T. R.; DEGOEY, P. Collective restraint in social dilemmas: Procedural justice and social identification effects on support for authorities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 69, n. 3, p. 482-497, 1995.
VAN CRAEN, M.; SKOGAN, W. G. Achieving Fairness in Policing: The Link Between Internal and External Procedural Justice. Police Quarterly, v. 20, n. 1, p. 3-23, 2017.
VITALE, A. The End of Policing. Brooklyn/EUA: Verso, 2017.
WEICHSELBAUM, S. The ‘Chicago Model’ of Policing Hasn’t Saved Chicago. The Marshall Project, 2016.
WHELLER, L.; QUINTON, P.; FILDES, A.; MILLS, A. The Greater Manchester Police procedural justice training experiment. The impact of communication skills training on officers and victims of crime. College of Policing, 2013.
WOOD, G.; TYLER, T. R.; PAPACHRISTOS, A. Procedural justice training reduces police misconduct and use of force. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020.
ZANETIC, A.; PAES MANSO, B.; NATAL, A.; OLIVEIRA, T. R. Legitimidade da polícia: segurança pública para além da dissuasão. Civitas, v. 16, n. 4, p. 148-173, 2016.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Brasileira de Segurança Pública
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Licencia
La Revista Brasileña de Seguridad Pública utiliza la Licencia Creative Commons como forma de licenciamiento para sus trabajos publicados. La licencia utilizada sigue el modelo CC BY 4.0 - Atribución 4.0 Internacional.
Para ver los derechos permitidos por favor vaya a la licencia completa o a nuestra página de Derechos de Autor y Licencias.
